Articles
What the Flock?
An index of reporting, court records, and public filings showing what happens beyond Flock's public-safety claims. These are the documented problems, mistakes, and abuses that can be easy to miss when the story comes only from the vendor or the agencies using the cameras.
30 articles · page 2 of 2 · RSS
-
As license plate readers expand, North Bay communities debate the meaning of public safety
norcalpublicmedia.org
NorCal Public Media reports on the widening North Bay argument over automated license plate readers, covering how cities in and around Sonoma County have weighed police claims about solved cases against residents' objections to continuous vehicle tracking.
-
Traffic Violation! License Plate Reader Mission Creep Is Already Here
eff.org
Georgia State Patrol cited a motorcyclist in December 2025 for holding a phone, with the ticket reading "CAPTURED ON FLOCK CAMERA." Flock has said publicly that its ALPR system is not used for traffic enforcement, but its partner program now lists six traffic-enforcement technology companies, and public records show speed cameras connected to its network.
-
Cameras in Sonoma Are Watching You
sonomasun.com
A detailed account of the 16 ALPR cameras installed around the City of Sonoma's perimeter in 2023 for roughly $50,000. The cameras record plate numbers, vehicle color and type, and whether a plate is present. Police Chief Brandon Cutting, one of three certified administrators, says federal agencies cannot reach the data and that outside requests require administrator approval and are logged.
-
A federal judge ruled Norfolk's Flock surveillance cameras don't invade people's privacy – yet
whro.org
Judge Mark Davis granted summary judgment to Norfolk on 27 January 2026, holding that the city's 176 Flock cameras and 21-day retention window do not amount to an unconstitutional search. He warned the analysis could change as systems expand, writing that in Norfolk "the answer is: not today." The plaintiffs, represented by the Institute for Justice, plan to appeal.
-
Public safety must-have or threat to civil liberties? Debate over Flock license plate reader cameras has taken hold in North Bay
pressdemocrat.com
The Press Democrat surveys Flock deployments across the North Bay and finds Santa Rosa running the largest network in the region: 129 cameras with four more awaiting installation, under two contracts worth $421,650 and $897,999 in state and federal money, on a 30-day retention window. Healdsburg and Rohnert Park operate 26 and 23 cameras respectively.
-
What the Flock is happening with license plate readers?
malwarebytes.com
An overview of how the Flock network reached well over 100,000 cameras across more than 4,000 cities, roughly one camera per 4,000 people. It explains the default 30-day retention window, how flagged records escape it, and the volunteer projects that have grown up to map deployments, including DeFlock and Have I Been Flocked.
-
We Hacked Flock Safety Cameras in under 30 Seconds.
youtube.com
A video posted by Benn Jordan is titled as a demonstration of gaining access to Flock Safety cameras in under 30 seconds. The available page text consists only of the title and a sponsor message for Ground News, so no findings, methods, or Flock response are described in the accessible material.
-
Breaking The Creepy AI in Police Cameras
youtube.com
A YouTube video whose description states that a private startup has been logging and sharing vehicle location data on United States drivers without their consent. The available text frames the piece as an examination of the artificial intelligence used in police camera systems. The description is truncated, so the full scope of the segment is not stated.
-
San Francisco Woman Pulled Out of Car at Gunpoint Because of License Plate Reader Error
aclu.org
A plate reader misread one digit of Denise Green's license plate in 2009, flagging her burgundy Lexus as a stolen gray GMC truck. San Francisco officers stopped her at gunpoint and searched her for twenty minutes without first verifying the plate visually. The Ninth Circuit reinstated her lawsuit after a district court initially ruled the mistake reasonable.
-
Judge Rules Lawsuit Challenging Norfolk's Use of Flock Cameras Can Proceed
ij.org
The Institute for Justice announced that a federal judge declined to dismiss its Fourth Amendment challenge to Norfolk's 172-camera Flock network, citing Carpenter v. United States on warrantless location tracking. Plaintiffs Lee Schmidt and Crystal Arrington argue that a city-wide record of their daily movements is a search requiring a warrant.