Articles
What the Flock?
An index of reporting, court records, and public filings showing what happens beyond Flock's public-safety claims. These are the documented problems, mistakes, and abuses that can be easy to miss when the story comes only from the vendor or the agencies using the cameras.
19 articles · RSS
-
Fayetteville City Council approves ban on automatic license plate readers
nwaonline.com
The Fayetteville, Arkansas city council voted 7-0 to adopt an ordinance prohibiting the purchase and use of automated license plate readers, a preemptive measure since the police department owns none. The police chief said he would prefer safeguards over a ban, citing security, accuracy and misuse problems. Researchers on a panel described federal "side door access" to shared ALPR databases and inconsistent retention and sharing rules across states.
-
We Demand More Information on How Marin Cops Illegally Shared Flock ALPR Data
eff.org
EFF and the ACLU of Northern California sent the Marin County Sheriff's Office a demand letter and public records request after the Point Reyes Light reported that the agency gave non-California agencies access to its Flock ALPR database, including 254,131 shared searches in November 2024. The groups say this violates SB 34, SB 54, and the 2022 Lagleva settlement, and they seek an audit and penalties.
-
Local ACLU Foundation sues city of San Diego, police department over use of Flock cameras
kpbs.org
The ACLU Foundation of San Diego and Imperial Counties, representing the Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans, sued the city and its police department over Flock Safety license plate readers, arguing they violate the California constitution's privacy guarantee. The suit seeks removal of the cameras and deletion of collected data. The article notes SDPD halted federal data sharing in 2025 after guidance from the state attorney general.
-
Flock cameras and privacy concerns: Where Minnesota communities stand
fox9.com
FOX 9 compiles decisions by Minnesota communities on Flock Safety license plate readers. Columbia Heights, Crystal, Duluth, North Branch, Fridley, and others have canceled, paused, or declined to renew contracts, and the University of Minnesota removed a camera after community objections. Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher defends the technology, citing declines in carjackings. State law requires ALPR data destruction within 60 days absent an active investigation.
-
Flock data-sharing suit likely headed back to state court
courthousenews.com
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said he was inclined to find that California drivers suing Flock lack Article III standing, but also indicated he would likely remand the consolidated cases to state court. Plaintiffs argue Flock let out-of-state agencies search local ALPR databases, citing 1.6 million searches of San Francisco police data between August 2024 and February 2025, in violation of the 2015 California ALPR Privacy Act.
-
Plymouth is latest Minnesota city to ditch Flock cameras
mprnews.org
The Plymouth, Minnesota city council voted to end use of the city's 16 Flock license plate reader cameras, with only the mayor dissenting. Council members cited concerns that agencies outside Plymouth could access the data, referencing reporting that federal agencies obtained Minnesota Flock data for immigration enforcement and that about 50 officers nationally were accused of misuse. Plymouth joins more than a dozen Minnesota jurisdictions pausing or ending Flock use.
-
Sen. Wyden presses Flock CEO over allegations of surveillance platform abuse
ktvz.com
Senators Ron Wyden and Adam Schiff sent a letter to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley demanding answers about unauthorized use of the company's license plate reader network, including tracking of reproductive health travel and warrantless immigration searches. The letter cites a Washington Post analysis finding at least 50 officers charged or accused of misusing the system, and instructs Flock to preserve records.
-
Fight Creepy ALPR Cameras ("Get The Flock Out")
aclu.org
The ACLU's campaign page against ALPR deployment, with an organizing toolkit for residents seeking to end local contracts. It puts the Flock network at roughly 120,000 cameras, states that fewer than one percent of scanned vehicles connect to a crime, and catalogs uses by federal immigration agents and against critics of police departments.
-
‘Creepy surveillance’: why some cities are shutting down Flock cameras amid privacy concerns
theguardian.com
Residents and council members in Dunwoody, Georgia pressed Flock Safety over a terms-of-service change and hacking demonstrations, deferring rather than cancelling a roughly half-million-dollar annual contract. Security researchers showed some Condor cameras streaming to the open internet and firmware passwords readable on a purchased device; Flock disputes the severity. Mountain View, Santa Cruz, South Pasadena, Flagstaff and Denver ended or paused programs, citing federal and out-of-state searches of local plate data.
-
Sonoma Extends Flock License Plate Camera Contract Through 2028
ksro.com
The Sonoma City Council unanimously approved a three-year, $150,000 extension of its Flock Safety license plate reader contract. Police Chief Brandon Cutting cited a 100% solution rate in recent vehicle-involved crimes, and the city maintains a 30-day deletion policy and a ban on sharing data with federal immigration agencies. Sonoma operates 16 cameras and officials are discussing expanding coverage to all major routes into town.
-
Why some cities are canceling Flock license plate reader contracts
npr.org
NPR reports on municipalities ending Flock Safety agreements, with local officials citing the prospect of federal immigration agents reaching data collected on residents and a lack of transparency about who can search it. The piece covers both the reasoning of councils that voted to cancel and the responses of police departments that wanted the cameras kept.
-
How Cops Are Using Flock Safety's ALPR Network to Surveil Protesters and Activists
eff.org
EFF analyzed more than 12 million Flock Safety ALPR searches logged by over 3,900 agencies between December 2024 and October 2025, obtained through public records requests. More than 50 federal, state, and local agencies ran hundreds of searches citing protest-related reasons, including "No Kings" rallies, immigration protests, and Direct Action Everywhere actions. Roughly 20 percent of all searches reviewed listed vague reasons such as "investigation" or "suspect."
-
Leaving the Door Wide Open: Flock Surveillance Systems Expose Washington Data to Immigration Enforcement
jsis.washington.edu
Records obtained from 31 Washington law enforcement agencies show at least eight enabled direct data sharing of their Flock networks with U.S. Border Patrol during 2025, while audits indicate Border Patrol also had apparent access to networks of at least ten departments that never authorized it. Researchers documented searches run on behalf of ICE, out-of-state searches including a Texas abortion investigation, and discrepancies that obscure the true scope of sharing.
-
Leaving the Door Wide Open: Flock Surveillance Systems Expose Washington Data to Immigration Enforcement
jsis.washington.edu
University of Washington researchers traced three routes by which federal immigration agents reached Washington ALPR data. At least eight local agencies enabled direct sharing with Border Patrol; agents ran thousands of searches on at least ten more departments' networks without explicit authorization; and a single county sheriff's search listing "ICE" as its reason touched 89 networks.
-
Santa Rosa police chief addresses concerns about Flock cameras, privacy and ICE access
newsbreak.com
Santa Rosa Police Chief John Cregan told KRCB that the department's license plate reader data is shared only with a limited set of Northern California agencies under signed memoranda of understanding, and is not shared with federal agencies or used for immigration, political, medical, or religious tracking. He cited errors at Chico and Mountain View as human error and said a community meeting was scheduled for September 17 at the Utility Field Office.
-
California cops are breaking surveillance laws. Who's going to stop them?
sfstandard.com
The Attorney General's office has sent warning letters to at least twenty California agencies since June 2024 without going to court, and agencies kept sharing anyway. The California Highway Patrol ran an April search across 845 ALPR systems labeled "ICE case," and Sacramento County logged searches marked "DEA Assist" and "ATF" months after being warned.
-
Flock Safety's Feature Updates Cannot Make Automated License Plate Readers Safe
eff.org
A Texas sheriff's office searched more than 83,000 Flock cameras to locate a woman suspected of self-managing an abortion, and records showed over 4,000 immigration-related lookups by state and local police with no formal ICE agreement in place. EFF argues that search-term blocking, case-number requirements, and audit alerts are easily defeated by vague or reused justifications.
-
California police illegally share license plate reader data with ICE and Border Patrol
calmatters.org
Records obtained by Oakland Privacy showed California agencies breaking SB 34 more than 100 times in a single month by running plate searches for ICE and Customs and Border Protection, including the LAPD and the San Diego, Orange, and Riverside county sheriffs. Of 491,000 queries analyzed, more than 64,000 gave only a vague reason such as "investigation."
-
VICTORY! California Department of Justice Declares Out-of-State Sharing of License Plate Data Unlawful
eff.org
Attorney General Rob Bonta issued guidance confirming that SB 34 bars California police from sharing license plate data with out-of-state or federal agencies. EFF notes agencies had been sharing with hundreds of out-of-state agencies, including in states restricting abortion, and with CBP and ICE, and that over 99.9% of collected data connects to no crime.