Articles

What the Flock?

An index of reporting, court records, and public filings showing what happens beyond Flock's public-safety claims. These are the documented problems, mistakes, and abuses that can be easy to miss when the story comes only from the vendor or the agencies using the cameras.

96 articles · page 3 of 5 · RSS

  1. The debate around Flock cameras intensifies in Sonoma County

    sebastopoltimes.com

    A Penngrove resident's petition demanding removal of Flock license plate cameras in Sonoma County gathered 214 signatures, citing surveillance and data-sharing concerns. A Sebastopol councilmember opposed the cameras, referencing ICE. A Sheriff's Department spokesperson said data is kept 30 days, is not linked to the DMV, involves no facial recognition, and is audited, crediting the cameras with aiding three homicide investigations in fiscal year 2025-26.

  2. Flock contract cancellations grow among cities, other jurisdictions

    thehill.com

    Tempe and Cave Creek, Arizona, terminated their Flock Safety license plate reader contracts, joining more than 90 jurisdictions tracked by DeFlock that have cancelled or rejected the technology. Officials cited high-profile misuse cases, including a Washington Post finding that over 50 officers were accused of improper ALPR searches. Senator Josh Hawley opened an investigation, and Flock announced new audit and lockout features.

  3. Fusion Center Ran Flock Searches on Behalf of Feds, Santa Ana Records Show

    couriercalifornia.com

    Logs released by Santa Ana police show the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center ran more than 27,000 searches of the city's Flock ALPR network over six months, including at least eighty on behalf of federal agencies such as the FBI, ATF, DEA, US Marshals, IRS and Forest Service, plus an agency in Washington state. California law bars sharing ALPR data with federal and out-of-state agencies. The logs omit usernames and case numbers, and no promised efficacy audit exists.

  4. Residents voice concerns over Flock cameras at Santa Rosa Community Advisory Board Meeting

    northbayvanguard.com

    At a July 22 Community Advisory Board meeting, Santa Rosa Police Chief John Cregan presented on Flock cameras and ALPRs, and residents alongside the North Bay Organizing Project questioned auditing of outside agency searches, data retention, and crime-prevention metrics. The department says data is kept 30 days and not shared federally. Over 730,000 plate reads were logged in 30 days, with more than 300 California agencies granted access.

  5. Flock camera vandals say privacy reforms aren’t enough: ‘The changes are bull----’

    nbcnews.com

    Flock Safety announced reforms on Aug. 13, including shorter data retention and new oversight, following a wave of activist vandalism against its nationwide network of surveillance cameras. Activists targeting the cameras say the changes do not address their concerns. The report notes that some communities have persuaded local governments to cancel Flock contracts while others renew each year.

  6. Flock camera sabotage grows amid privacy concerns

    youtu.be

    According to the video description, cities across the country are unplugging Flock cameras used to record traffic and other violations as privacy concerns grow. The segment, reported by Jason Allen for CBS Evening News, also refers to sabotage of the camera units. No further detail is available in the posted text.

  7. New records detail Arizona Flock camera misuse...

    youtube.com

    Apache Junction Police internal affairs records detail how former Officer Joshua McDaniel admitted using Flock camera data to search for his wife’s license plate during marital troubles.

  8. Flock Has a Powerful New AI Tool for Police. We Got Its Code

    wired.com

    WIRED reconstructed code Flock Safety served from its own login pages, describing an AI tool called OS Investigate that ships with 69 prewritten prompts and 45 data tools. The prompts let officers find drivers by movement patterns, identify vehicle associates, and search by physical description, drawing on plate scans, arrest records, dispatch logs, and commercial identity databases. Flock says the product is still in development.

  9. Stow police cut ties with Flock Safety after officer allegedly used cameras to track someone he knows

    boston.com

    An internal affairs investigation found Stow, Massachusetts officer Jason Rogers ran vehicle searches through Flock Safety multiple times in 2024 and 2025 with no legitimate law enforcement purpose and queried the state criminal records database at least five times improperly. Rogers was placed on unpaid leave and faces criminal charges and termination proceedings. The chief ended the department's Flock contract, with the last camera removed in early August.

  10. Flock Safety overhauls rules following ANF investigations

    atlantanewsfirst.com

    Flock Safety announced it is cutting its default license plate data retention recommendation from 30 days to seven, adding an "evidence mode" cold storage option for active investigations. The company will require its machine learning audit tool, proactive account lockouts for abnormal search behavior, mandatory case codes, and multi-factor authentication. The changes follow reporting on more than a dozen officers disciplined or arrested for personal misuse, including stalking partners.

  11. Despite 'New' Updates, Flock's Creepy Cameras Remain Major Civil Liberties Threat

    aclu.org

    The ACLU assesses Flock Safety's announced operational changes, including a reduction in default data retention from 30 days to seven days with an "Evidence Mode" exception, local control over which offenses other agencies may search for, mandatory search reasons, and wider rollout of an audit tool. It argues most measures repeat earlier interventions that officers circumvented and that the audit tool has never been independently evaluated.

  12. Thomas Massie Moves to Defund Flock Camera Networks

    yahoo.com

    Rep. Thomas Massie announced plans to introduce a bill conditioning federal DHS, DOJ, and highway grants on jurisdictions not deploying Flock Safety or similar mass license plate reader systems. No bill text exists yet. The piece also describes Rep. Tim Burchett's Protection Against Mass Surveillance Act, a defeated ALPR funding amendment, and the Surveillance Accountability Act requiring warrants for facial recognition.

  13. Fight Creepy ALPR Cameras ("Get The Flock Out")

    aclu.org

    The ACLU's campaign page against ALPR deployment, with an organizing toolkit for residents seeking to end local contracts. It puts the Flock network at roughly 120,000 cameras, states that fewer than one percent of scanned vehicles connect to a crime, and catalogs uses by federal immigration agents and against critics of police departments.

  14. Narragansett council votes to end Flock surveillance camera program

    bostonglobe.com

    Narragansett's town council voted 5-0 to terminate its Flock Safety contract, which ran to 2027, and to absorb any cancellation fees. Residents and members raised data-misuse concerns, and a former councilwoman noted the program had outgrown its authorization as a one-year pilot. The town operated three cameras; a fourth was stolen.

  15. Flock sees controversial camera contracts canceled in 23 states

    washingtonexaminer.com

    Roughly 23 city councils have voted to cancel, reject, or deactivate Flock Safety license plate readers since January 2026, with about 98 doing so since 2021, according to the activist group Deflock. Harrisonburg and Elkton, Virginia, Framingham, Massachusetts, and Saranac Lake, New York, are among them, citing Fourth Amendment and data-sharing concerns. Flock says agencies own their data and set retention schedules.

  16. Police are spending opioid settlement funds on Flock cameras

    motherjones.com

    Mother Jones identified 19 law enforcement agencies in ten states that spent more than $920,000 in opioid settlement funds on Flock cameras and competing license plate readers since 2024, plus six localities funding contracts with the Peregrine data platform. Officials argued the cameras address drug trafficking, while addiction policy advocates and residents in Morgantown and Pensacola objected that the money should fund treatment.

  17. 6 more Ga. police department employees under investigation over alleged Flock camera misuse

    wrdw.com

    Savannah Police placed four officers and two civilian employees on administrative leave after an internal audit found searches unrelated to law enforcement, including queries about acquaintances and family members. One officer allegedly gave an outside agency access to the department's Flock system. All six cases went to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

  18. In one California town, Flock misread license plates in 71% of the alerts it sent to police

    businessinsider.com

    Public records obtained from the Roseville, California police department show that of 1,427 Flock alerts flagging vehicles as stolen or felony-related in 2023 and 2024, a department analysis found 71% involved misread plates. Records document missed vehicles, blurry images, and delayed alerts, with repeated complaints to Flock. Flock attributed problems to Roseville's atypical camera setup; state lawmakers called for a reliability review.

  19. Flock Cameras Got the Wrong License Plate 71% of the Time in California City

    gizmodo.com

    An analysis reported by Business Insider found that of 1,427 Flock camera alerts sent to Roseville, California police between 2023 and 2024, 71% of stolen-vehicle or felony-related alerts involved misread plates. Flock attributed the errors to older hardware and non-standard camera placement, a claim Roseville police dispute. The city has spent roughly $450,000; the Institute for Justice has documented at least 27 wrongful stops nationally.

  20. Map Shows Cities That Have Rejected, Deactivated Flock Cameras

    newsweek.com

    Drawing on DeFlock's crowd-sourced data, Newsweek counts 95 cities that have rejected ALPR systems: 22 deactivating cameras, 47 canceling contracts, and 25 turning down proposed agreements. Ypsilanti, Michigan is identified as the only jurisdiction with an outright ban. Officials cited privacy risk, federal data access, and inadequate public consultation.