Articles

What the Flock?

An index of reporting, court records, and public filings showing what happens beyond Flock's public-safety claims. These are the documented problems, mistakes, and abuses that can be easy to miss when the story comes only from the vendor or the agencies using the cameras.

6 articles · RSS

  1. Flock Cameras Are The New Patriot Act

    thefederalist.com

    An opinion piece traces the funding and legal lineage of automated license plate readers to post-9/11 surveillance programs, noting DHS grant channels and fusion centers that finance local purchases. It cites a Norfolk lawsuit showing one driver logged 526 times in four months, a California class action over federal and ICE access through a described side door, and an August 2026 study finding vehicle theft fell about 11 percent with no detectable gain in recoveries.

  2. Flock Cameras Got the Wrong License Plate 71% of the Time in California City

    gizmodo.com

    An analysis reported by Business Insider found that of 1,427 Flock camera alerts sent to Roseville, California police between 2023 and 2024, 71% of stolen-vehicle or felony-related alerts involved misread plates. Flock attributed the errors to older hardware and non-standard camera placement, a claim Roseville police dispute. The city has spent roughly $450,000; the Institute for Justice has documented at least 27 wrongful stops nationally.

  3. As license plate readers expand, North Bay communities debate the meaning of public safety

    norcalpublicmedia.org

    NorCal Public Media reports on the widening North Bay argument over automated license plate readers, covering how cities in and around Sonoma County have weighed police claims about solved cases against residents' objections to continuous vehicle tracking.

  4. Sonoma City Council extends Flock contract for automated license plate readers

    sonomanews.com

    Sonoma's city council voted unanimously on 30 March 2026 to extend its Flock Safety contract three years through September 2028 at up to $50,500 annually, covering 16 cameras. Police Chief Brandon Cutting cited a September 2025 home invasion solved with the system and said data deletes after 30 days. The council separately approved $224,000 for Verkada cameras at city facilities.

  5. Eugene and Springfield both announce end of Flock camera usage

    opb.org

    Eugene and Springfield, Oregon, announced they are ending use of Flock Safety license plate cameras, citing unspecified vulnerabilities and limitations affecting data security and operational control. Eugene terminated its contract outright, while Springfield will remove cameras that were never activated but said it may seek another ALPR vendor. Opponents cited federal surveillance risks; police had credited the cameras with faster stolen-vehicle recoveries.

  6. Do license plate readers enhance the initial and residual deterrent effects of police patrol? A quasi-randomized test

    nij.ojp.gov

    A 2021 randomized field experiment assigned license plate readers to some hot-spot patrols and not others, analyzing 785 patrols across 33 locations. Stolen vehicle recoveries rose, but arrests did not, and the readers produced no measurable drop in calls for service during or after patrols. The authors found little clear evidence that ALPRs prevent crime in general patrol.